Generally, the mode of
obtaining statements by the police is to first administer a word of caution on
the suspect. If the suspect can write in English, it is advisable for the
police to give a paper to the suspect and allow him to freely make the
statement. If the suspect speaks or writes another language different from
English, the police should allow the suspect to make his statement in that
language. Thereafter, an interpreter may translate the statement to English
language. If the suspect cannot write, the statement must first be recorded in
the language in which the suspect made the statement. Where an interpreter is
used in obtaining a statement, the statement is inadmissible unless the person
who interpreted it is called as a witness as well as the person who wrote the
statement down.
If a suspect is making a
confessional statement admitting a crime, it will be necessary for the police
to take the suspect and the statement to a superior police officer for
confirmation and endorsement in line with the Judges Rules.
Statements are to be taken
voluntarily from suspects and should not be obtained in a questionable manner
or in a question and answer manner. If a suspect is forced to make a statement
or the statement made under duress, compulsion, threat or promise of an
advantage, such statement may not be admissible in court as evidence: section 29(2) of the Evidence Act 2011.
The procedure for taking a
confessional statement is as follows:
Under section 15(4) of the ACJA 2015, where a suspect who is arrested
with or without a warrant volunteers to make a confessional statement, the
police officer shall ensure that the making and taking of the statement shall
be in writing and may be recorded electronically on a retrievable video compact
disc or such audio visual means.
In similar vein, section 17(1) & (2) of the ACJA 2015
provides to the effect that where a suspect is arrested on allegation of having
committed an offence, his statement shall be taken, if he so wishes to make a
statement. Such a statement may be taken in the presence of a legal
practitioner of his choice, or where he has no legal practitioner of his
choice, in the presence of an officer of the Legal Aid Council of Nigeria or an
official of a Civil Society Organization or a Justice of the Peace or any other
person of his choice.
Under the Administration of Criminal Justice (Repeal
& Re-enactment) Law 2011, which is applicable in Lagos State, there is
the requirement that the making and taking of such a confessional statement
must be recorded in a video or in the alternative in writing and in the
presence of the maker’s lawyer: section
9(3) of the ACJ (R&R) Law 2011.
There is also the need for
caution before the confessional statement is made. The caution is administered after
informing the suspect that he may be prosecuted in the course of the
interrogation. It goes as follows: “You are not obliged to say anything unless
you wish to do so, but whatever you say may be put in writing and given in
evidence”.
However, by section 31 of the Evidence Act 2011, a
confessional statement that is otherwise relevant shall not be irrelevant only
by reason of the fact that the maker of the such statement was not warned that
he was not bound to make such a statement and that evidence of it might be
given. Indeed, in Usman v. State, it
was held that breaches of the Judges’
Rules do not render a document inadmissible. At best, such breaches might
only affect the weight the court attaches to the statement and certainly not
its admissibility.
Accordingly, confessional
statements obtained contrary to Judges’
Rules are admissible provided that
it was voluntary. An alternative to caution is taking an accused before a
superior Police Officer before he makes and signs the confession.
Under the Criminal Procedure Code Law, applicable
to the Northern States, a confessional statement can be made to a Justice of Peace
or police officer after the appropriate caution. The Justice of Peace or police
officer shall record same in the case
diary and sign same. Such recorded confession need not be on oath.
© Onyekachi Duru Esq and www.legalemperors.com, 2016. (All Rights Reserved) Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Onyekachi Duru Esq and www.legalemperors.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
© Onyekachi Duru Esq and www.legalemperors.com, 2016. (All Rights Reserved) Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Onyekachi Duru Esq and www.legalemperors.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.